| WORK
SESSION of the Greenbelt City Council held Monday, March 5, 2001, for
the purpose of receiving a briefing from staff on the Greenbelt Station
Conceptual Site Plan.

Mayor Davis started the meeting at 8:05 p.m. It was held in the Council
Room of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT WERE: Council members Edward V.J. Putens, Rodney M. Roberts,
Alan Turnbull, and Mayor Judith F. Davis.
STAFF PRESENT WERE: Michael P. McLaughlin, City Manager; Celia Craze,
Director, Dept. of Planning and Community Development; Terri Hruby,
Community Planner; and Kathleen Gallagher, City Clerk.
ALSO PRESENT WERE: Kap Kapastin, Quantum Management and Beltway Plaza;
Sheldon Goldberg, Advisory Planning Board; Kate Spencer, Barry Schlesinger,
Doug Love, and Michael Boone, Citizens to Conserve and Restore Indian
Creek (CCRIC); Joe Wilkinson; Amy Boyes, the Gazette; Virginia Beauchamp,
Greenbelt News Review, and several others.
Information Items - Other Business
Mayor Davis opened the meeting with several brief items. 1) She said
she spoke with Gerry Madison before he departed for Florida, and he
extended good-byes to all. 2) The Glen Oaks apartment complex is to
be sold and the new owners intend to update it. 3) The Mayor is now
on the Internet at home and can be reached by e-mail.
Ms. Gallagher said Greenbelt Homes, Inc., would like to hold the March
19 stakeholder meeting in their Board Room and asked if Council could
meet at 7:30 p.m. Council agreed to do so.
Metroland Plan
Terri Hruby gave an overview of the plan based upon the map submitted
by Metroland Developers, Inc. Many questions were raised to which there
are no clear answers at this time. As Ms. Hruby and Ms. Craze pointed
out, the City and Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning have
both documented the gaps in the plan, and this is what caused the developer
to place the review on hold. Ms. Hruby clarified that the plan has
not been withdrawn; the County is holding it for more information.
There was general agreement that the plan as submitted is incomplete
and unacceptable on many points. Some of the questionable matters included:
how aspects of this plan relate to the State land purchase at this
point; indications of plans to reforest land that is already forested;
the north-south connector road; the internal trail system; the relative
location of commercial and residential components; lack of information
on building placement and orientation; and the timing and sequencing
of the phases of the plan. Mr. Schlesinger remarked that a basic problem
is that the developer is trying to create a park rather than preserve
existing features of the land.
Mr. Putens asked if the City has heard back from the State subsequent
to Council’s meeting with the Governor’s staff. Mr. McLaughlin
said there had been no response on the substantive issues. Council
agreed it was time to send a letter of follow-up to the Governor’s
office.
Mr. Roberts asked about response from WMATA and the Corps of Engineers.
Council asked Mr. McLaughlin to follow up on this as well. Mr. Turnbull
stressed the importance of the City’s following up on its requests
for documentation of all these matters because of what appears to be
a great deal of "shoddy procedure." Ms. Spencer noted that
CCRIC has requested much of the same documentation the City has and
has received an equally poor response.
Ms. Craze stated that the 10-year water and sewer plan is scheduled
for presentation on March 27 to the County Council but that there was
no specific action for City Council to take beyond having expressed
its opinion.
Mayor Davis asked if others wanted to raise issues. Mr. Kapastin said
no one had thus far mentioned the proposed use of the commercial spaces
in the plan. He said he is very concerned that they will not hold to
uses that will complement Beltway Plaza. He particularly noted the
proposed movie theater space, saying this could affect more than 20%
of Beltway Plaza’s rents. He added that Beltway Plaza is not
mentioned at all in the developer’s retail study. Mr. Putens
encouraged Mr. Kapastin to comment on these matters officially to the
County.
Council discussed whether it should initiate a meeting with the new
legal representatives of the developer. Ms. Craze said she did not
think further discussion with the lawyers would be productive and asked
if it would be possible to reach the real decision-makers for the company.
Mayor Davis inquired about accelerating the meeting with Westfield.
Mr. McLaughlin said he thought the City needed a "strategizing" meeting
before meeting with Westfield.
Ms. Craze stated that she thought it was time for Council to move
beyond the broader concepts of the plan and begin to focus on more
narrowly defined issues and problems, including, for example, the impact
of various levels of traffic on roads and intersections. She also suggested
the adoption of an official plan for Cherrywood Lane.
It was agreed that Council should consider holding an Executive Session
to consider some of these matters and their legal ramifications for
the City.
Ms. Spencer gave a brief summary of the multitude of problems CCRIC
has identified regarding the impact of this plan on the environmental
envelope. She asked that CCRIC be included in any eventual meeting
with Westfield if possible.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathleen Gallagher
City Clerk
|