| MINUTES
OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION held Monday, June 17, 2002, for the
purpose of discussing a model for legislation to provide a land preservation
plan for woodland and park areas in Greenbelt.

Mayor Davis started the meeting at 8:05 p.m. It was held in the Council
Room of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT WERE: Council members Edward V. J. Putens, Rodney M. Roberts,
Alan Turnbull, and Mayor Judith F. Davis.
STAFF PRESENT WERE: Michael P. McLaughlin, City Manager; Celia W. Craze,
Director, Planning and Community Development; and Kathleen Gallagher, City
Clerk.
ALSO PRESENT WERE: Paul Downs, Committee to Save the Green Belt; 15-20
interested residents; and Amy Boyes, the Gazette.
Following introductions, Ms. Craze gave an overview based on her memo
to the City Manager of February 28. She said staff had been charged with
devising a plan to protect the natural lands owned by the City. Staff believes
the State Wildlands Program, wherein certain state park lands are designated
as "wild lands" and are brought under legislative protection,
would provide a good model. The staff proposal is for a similar program
where certain lands would be protected by the City Council. The best mechanism
for doing this is not clear-cut, but the City Solicitor has recommended
establishing the program initially by ordinance, with any future changes
to be made by resolution, and with a provision to allow citizens to petition
to referendum any changes initiated by Council resolution. The City Solicitor
has also advised that to stipulate a super majority vote of Council to
make a change to the ordinance would require an amendment to the City Charter,
since a simple majority is otherwise assumed for Council actions.
There was some discussion of the state’s requirement for revising
the charter.
Since it was Mr. Roberts who had originally requested that Council take
action on preserving the land, Mayor Davis asked him if this plan would
meet his expectations. He said he thought it would.
Mr. Downs spoke in support of requiring a super majority of Council to
amend the program.
Ms. Craze commented that there should be language stating that unless
an action is explicitly permitted, it is prohibited.
Mr. Putens asked about utility easements. Ms. Craze said if an easement
already exists, it could be maintained. The City exerts a great deal of
control over granting permission for utility easements, though there is
no totally failsafe way to protect City land from condemnation proceedings.
She said for Parcels 1 and 2, the easements already exist; for Schrom and
Parcel 15, there might be more of an issue.
There was discussion of liability issues. Mr. Turnbull said under state
law, as long as the land is open to public use without fee, the City’s
liability is limited to structural hazards.
There was discussion of the extent to which trails should be maintained.
Mr. Roberts said they should not be. Mr. Turnbull did not agree, though
he thought a public group should determine what work should be done, not
City staff. Mayor Davis suggested the Park & Recreation Advisory Board
(PRAB) and the Advisory Committee on Trees (ACT) could perform that function
rather than a new body. The issue was not resolved, but Mr. Turnbull said
the plan should not eliminate all provision for needed and protective maintenance
on trails. Ms. Craze said the state program did not provide for maintenance,
but Mayor Davis asked her to find out what their practice is.
Ms. Craze said there might be a need for specific reference to structures
that are added casually to the area, such as foot bridges or children’s
tree forts. Mr. Roberts said this type of issue is below the level of a
broad dedication of the woodlands, and it was not his intention to prohibit
such use under this plan. Mr. Putens remarked that what starts as a small
undertaking often escalates into a larger one, for example, if an adult
decides to enhance a child’s tree fort.
In response to a question raised by a resident, there was discussion of
specifying mountain bikes as prohibited. There was also discussion of the
meaning of "motor vehicles" and "mechanical transport" and
what kinds of wheel chairs would be exceptions.
Mr. Robert raised the issue of what land would be included, noting that
the 72 acres between Parcels 1 and 2 (making up 184 contiguous acres) should
be included. Ms. Craze also asked about the perimeter trail land and Parcel
15. Mr. Turnbull said everything should be included that meets the definition
of "woodland" but does not already have its own management plan.
Mr. Downs stressed the importance of giving one or more names to the land
areas in question for the purpose of making them recognizable and giving
them identity as protected land. He noted a comment made previously by
Mr. Turnbull that names like "Parcel 1 and 2" make the land a
target for developers. Ms. Craze said the name used in her memo, "Greenbelt
Natural Reserve Area Program," was intended to refer to the whole
plan and program, not necessarily to be a name for the woodlands themselves.
There was discussion of holding a name contest.
A resident who serves on the Greenbelt Homes, Inc. (GHI) Woodlands Committee
expressed some concern about the City having a "no maintenance" policy
on its land while GHI is attempting to control exotic invasives. Mr. Roberts
said that, for the most part, the movement of exotic invasives would be
from people’s yards outward rather than vice versa, so he didn’t
think it would be a problem.
Mr. Turnbull asked what "landscape modification" meant as a
prohibited activity in the document, adding that he was supportive if it
meant changing grading, but not necessarily so if it meant invasive species
modification. Again, he said he would see a difference in what the City
might do versus what the citizens could do. Ms. Craze suggested having
a resource management plan, which could provide more detail and be referenced,
might be better than attempting to include too much in the legislation
itself.
Council agreed to refer the plan to PRAB, ACT, the Advisory Planning Board,
and the Youth Advisory Committee for their review in September, after staff
has had the opportunity to work on it further.
Mayor Davis thanked Ms. Craze for the staff’s work on this, saying
the City has been trying to find a way to deal with the subject for several
years, and this proposal will finally give direction to the effort.
Other Business
Mr. McLaughlin said the City of La Plata will hold a reception Monday
evening at the Maryland Municipal League conference for all the agencies
who provided aid to them. An appreciation day will also be held on June
28.
Mayor Davis reported that she had breakfast with Shukoor Ahmed, who is
running for state delegate. She has agreed to meet with any of the candidates
who request it.
The meeting ended at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathleen Gallagher
City Clerk
|